Find the data. Fund the people who made it.

A signed agreement that lets an AI team train models on media someone else owns — audio, video, images or text — in exchange for payment. The licence spells out what can be trained, for how long, and what rights travel with the data, so nobody is relying on fair-use guesses.

You send a spec: modality, language, hours, recording conditions. We match it against libraries whose owners have agreed to license, clear the rights, and deliver the data under a licence that grants AI-training use explicitly. One agreement covers the whole delivery.

Original audio, video, creator UGC, motion capture, sensor data, task demonstrations, and other media may be licensable when the supplier controls the relevant rights and the proposed AI use, identifiable people, embedded works, privacy, and contractual restrictions are addressed. A category page is not an availability claim; a particular collection still has to pass review.

Yes, through a written buyer licence. The agreement should identify the dataset, approved AI purposes, production or evaluation scope, recipients, term, territory, retention, and restrictions. A download, public post, or evaluation sample is not automatically a production-training grant.

It is a risk you inherit forever. Scraped material arrives with no rights, no consent and no chain of title — which is where most training-data disputes start. Our rights guides and the licensed-vs-scraped comparison below walk through the difference in detail.

Per licence. You keep ownership while fiund handles AI licensing under one contributor agreement, and you are paid each time an AI team licenses your material. What a deal is worth depends on modality, exclusivity and volume — the payouts guide explains how deals are structured.

Every permission needed for AI training is secured in writing before data changes hands: ownership confirmed, training rights granted explicitly in the licence, and voice and likeness consent covered wherever people are identifiable.

We connect each approved asset to its source, owner or authorized licensor, applicable agreement, consent status, known restrictions, and file-level manifest. Unresolved material is held back instead of being described as cleared.

No. fiund’s standard contributor terms do not authorize a buyer to create a synthetic replica, clone, or voice or likeness model intended to imitate an identifiable person, or use that identity to imply endorsement.

There is no universal rate card. Pricing is scoped to the content type, task fit, volume, source quality, metadata, consent and diligence work, permitted uses, delivery requirements, and any requested exclusivity. A quote follows the actual brief and verified inventory.

fiund targets an initial scope and availability response within two business days. That response distinguishes current inventory from data that would need to be sourced or commissioned; it is not a promise that every collection can be delivered in that window.

An approved delivery can include the buyer licence, a versioned file manifest, data dictionary, technical specifications, provenance and consent references, known restrictions, and integrity evidence for the exact transferred set.